Weeks before Zambia’s election, a Global Witness report alleges mining-sector influence over government policy—but explicitly concedes it found no evidence of corruption or illegality. This critique argues the report’s conclusions outstrip its evidence, raising broader questions about methodology, electoral timing, and the evidentiary standards required for claims of institutional capture.
The post Evidence, inference and democratic legitimacy: Reading the Global Witness report on Zambia appeared first on This is Africa.
Originally published by This Is Africa.